Macbeth vs. the Chrysalids EssayGet Your
Starting at Just $13.90 a page
Macbeth versus The Chrysalids William Shakespeare and John Wyndham both demonstrate a strong theme of change in the play, Macbeth, and in the novel, The Chrysalids. The theme of change is represented in both the novel and play through the characters, and their life changes. Change is revealed throughout both artifacts, and both display how the characters’ lives change dramatically from start to end. Shakespeare and Wyndham expose change in these artifacts to set the climax of the play and novel.
Firstly, in the play Macbeth, the character Macbeth changes after the murder of Banquo and Duncan and his conscience is presented, this compares to the novel The Chrysalids, because during the war, the Sealanders kill the people from Waknuk and the Fringes, moreover changing the conscience of Waknuk. Secondly, Macbeth’s reputation is altered, because of his no longer high status after his death, which relates to the novel The Chrysalids, because Sophie’s status in Waknuk changes after her six toes are exposed after hiding them her whole life, along with the telepath’s telepathic powers being revealed everything changes for them.
Lastly, in the play Macbeth, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth’s relationship is transformed due to his change of heart for his wife, and how he adjusts after her death, which relates to The Chrysalids because David and Sophie’s relationship is changed after Sophie leaves Waknuk. Macbeth by William Shakespeare, and The Chrysalids, by John Wyndham both include the theme of change all through the novel and play in the course of the changing of characters after deaths occur, the character’s reputation and status is altered within both artifacts, and the relationship between the characters after being separated.
To begin with, the play Macebth, and the novel, The Chrysalids, deals with the theme of change due to Macbeth and Waknuk’s conscience being introduced. Macbeth’s conscience is finally revealed after the murder of Banquo. In the beginning of the play, Macbeth is not aware of his conscience, but once he kills Banquo and Duncan, his conscience starts haunting him, which also causes the illusions of him seeing the ghosts.
Macbeth’s change of conscience is publicized throughout the whole play, because Macbeth’s conscience at the beginning is good, then it is guilty and alive, and he is troubled by hallucinations, sleeplessness, and dreadful dreams, following, after he is slaughtered by Lady Macduff and her children, Macbeth’s conscience going away, and is no longer tormented by ghosts and voices, at the end when Macbeth meets Macduff, his wretched life does feel twinges of conscience again. (Shakespeare, xxviii) This shows how his conscience changes entirely all through the play, Macbeth.
The theme of change is also used in, The Chrysalids Waknuk is a place, which discriminates people who are deviated, and sends them to The Fringes. The leaders of Waknuk rule everyone, and are careless about the Sealanders because they think they are all strange and deviated in some way. Throughout the entire novel, Waknuk controls all of the telepaths and deviations, although, during the war between Waknuk and the Fringes, the Sealanders come and kill all of them with a web-like substance.
During the time as the people from Waknuk are being killed by the Sealanders, they are in shock because they have never thought that all these years they have killed or isolated deviations, that the deviated people will actually kill them, and now it is happening. Waknuk’s psychological conscience is presented because of the fact that they feel guilty for killing and torturing innocent people. This illustrates the theme of change because it shows how it went from the Waknuk people ruling everyone, to the Sealanders people taking over, and killing the ‘normal’ people.
This relates to the play, because Macbeth and Waknuk’s conscience is at hand and has changed throughout the play and novel, which illustrates the theme of change. The theme of change is presented in Macbeth and The Chrysalids due to Macbeth and Waknuk’s self and physiological conscience. Secondly, Macbeth and The Chrysalids are significant to the altering statuses of Macbeth, Sophie, David and the other telepaths.
Macbeth’s reputation is modified throughout the play, because in the beginning Macbeth is known as a heroic character, with being the first words spoken about him by the bleeding Sergeant are “brave Macbeth” and Ross praises him as “Bellona’s bridegroom” and Banquo calls him “noble partner. ” (Shakespeare, xxvii) Although, at the end of the play he is cursed and executed. He plunges from the heights, where he is admired and respected, to the lowest depths. (Shakespeare, xxvii) His vaulting ambitions caused his hate by the people, and his reputation is ruined, because of his no longer high status after his death.
Sophie has been hiding her deviated feet her whole life, although when Alan sees her footprint, he sees her six toes, and immediately chases after her. (Wyndham, 44-45) Sophie and her family decide to go into hiding. (Wyndham, 46) This shows how Waknuk’s society is prejudice and discriminates deviations, which do not indicate who they really are inside, and how Sophie’s status is changed in Waknuk, resembling to Macbeth’s status. That is how Sophie’s deviated feet being discovered, illustrates the theme of change in, The Chrysalids.
As well, once the telepath’s telepathic powers are exposed, everything changes for them, as well as their status in the society of Waknuk. “If we do not remain hidden, we should be finished. ” (Wyndham, 85) This quote by David, explains how no one else must know about their powers, or else they are in great danger, and will eventually be killed, because of their prejudice society. The telepaths are discovered, and must pack up and flee from Waknuk. (Wyndham, 122) They are now at risk, which uncovers the theme of change in The Chrysalids.
This is how Macbeth and The Chrysalids, presents the theme of change throughout the novel and play, due to Macbeth, Sophie, David and the other telepath’s altered status in each character’s society. Lastly, the play Macbeth, and the novel The Chrysalids, both contain the theme of change through Macbeth and Lady Macbeth’s relationship after her death, and how David and Sophie’s relationship is no longer in touch after her run away. After the death of Macbeth’s wife, Lady Macbeth, Macbeth’s love for his wife changes as time goes on.
He has a change of heart because in the beginning of the play, Macbeth loves his wife very much, although by the end, there is no love left in his heart for his dead wife. In his heart, he loves her still, while his selfishness lust for power has driven them apart. “Macbeth…and when by the instigations of his wife he is prevailed upon to do it, his mind is afterwards willed with remorse. ” (Scott 172) This demonstrates that Macbeth’s love for his wife has changed in the play, which illustrates the theme of change.
In the novel, The Chrysalids, David and Sophie’s relationship is torn apart after her flee to the Fringes. Once Sophie runs away, David says, “Nothing I knew was going to be quite the same ever again. ” (Wyndham, 47) This quote from David, explains the theme of change because he talks about how his and Sophie’s relationship will never be the same, because now everything is ruined and David will probably never see her again because he would not know where to find her or how to communicate with her.
This relates to Macbeth, because it is the same situation. Even though Sophie is not dead, David has lost touch with her, and Macbeth has lost love for Lady Macbeth. Through the changes in Macbeth and his wife’s relationship, and between David and Sophie’s relationship, the theme of change revolves around the play, Macbeth, and the novel, The Chrysalids. Overall, William Shakespeare’s, Macbeth, and John Wyndham’s, The Chrysalids are both relevant to the theme of change throughout the play and novel from the changing of the characters and their lives.
Firstly, in Macbeth, after the murder of Banquo and Duncan Macbeth’s conscience is presented, which compares to The Chrysalids, because the Sealanders slaughter the people from Waknuk and the Fringes during the war, which affects the conscience of Waknuk. Secondly, Macbeth’s status is transformed, because of his poor importance after his death, which relates to the novel The Chrysalids, because Sophie, David, and the other telepath’s status in Waknuk changes after their deviations are exposed.
Do you like
this material?Get help to write a similar one
Lastly, in Macbeth, Macbeth and Lady Macbeth’s relationship is out of shape due to his change of heart for his wife, and how he adjusts after her death, which relates to The Chrysalids because David and Sophie’s relationship is no longer attainable after Sophie flees to the Fringes. All in all, Macbeth and The Chrysalids, show a great connection to the theme of change. Works Cited Shakespeare, William. Macbeth. Mississauga, Ontario: Longmans Canada Ltd. , 1965. Scott, Mark W. Shakespearean Notes. Detroit, Michigan: Gale Research Company. 1986. Wyndham, John. The Chrysalids. London, England: Penguin Books. 1955.
Author: Kimber Trivett
Macbeth vs. the Chrysalids Essay
We have so large base of authors that we can prepare a unique summary of any book. Don't believe? Check it!
How fast would you like to get it?
The Chrysalids Essay
. Plants are burned, animals are slaughtered, and human deviations are banished to the Fringes where they are out of sight, cannot reproduce, and will either die or live a miserable life. The main reason that the citizens of Waknuk desire such sameness and conformity is because of their superstitious and religious beleifs. They believe that God sent tribulations to "The Old People", and that was why their society was destroyed. Because they don't want the same thing to happen to their society, the people of "The New World" and of Waknuk believe that they must keep the gene pool free of mutations and deviations, so that everyone is made in the "true image" of God. Those who are not in the "true image", and those who do not do everything within their capability to keep society true to how God created and desired it are shaming God, and will force him to send tribulations to the town as punishment. The extreme need of the citizens of Waknuk to conform and follow their cultural superstitions drives them to do crazy things that are detrimental to their community, such as burn crops, kill livestock, and send away or kill their friends and family. Without this extreme desire to rid themselves and their community of differences, and to please God and avoid his wrath and punishment, the citizens of Waknuk could probably live fairly normal lives. They would have more food, more livestock, and probably more money from selling anything that they had left over. The Chrysalids demonstrates how diversity can be a good thing, and how dangerous conformity and societal superstitions can be
Through Joseph Strorm's harsh treatment of David, we can see how important the issue of conformity is to the inhabitants of Waknuk.Conformity in Waknuk is manifested in several ways, be it burning of Deviant crops, slaughtering of Deviant livestock and spreading awareness on the dangers of the Mutant to their peaceful society.Joseph shows this need for conformity in this passage by blasting David for even suggesting deviation from the Norm. The evidence for this is "you Blasphemed, boy. You found fault with the Norm," "This is a terrible thing, an outrageous thing. You are…committing blasphemy!" Joseph immediately accused poor David of having blasphemed and started yelling at him, without mercy or bothering to understand the truth.His treatment of David therefore shows how important conformity to the Norm really is to him.
In the famous novel, The Chrysalids, by John Wyndham, the author develops ideas on the nature and effect of conformity through the society of Waknuk. Much of The Chrysalids revolves around conformity, superstition, and their consequences. The people of Waknuk are all extremely conformist. They live, and have been raised in a community where there is no room for diversity,...
Loading: Checking Spelling0%